One piece of scientific evidence, among many, against Evolution.

In the current module we're reading, it discussed how there is a lot more evidence against evolution than evidence for it. Let's take the archaeopteryx as one example...  

They talked about how evolutionists took the archaeopteryx as a "missing link" between reptiles and birds just because the prehistoric bird had claws protruding from it's wings, and teeth in it's beak.  That was the only two things that they related of being closely connected to reptiles.  Everything else proved to be from pure bird ancestry.

Later on as more bird fossils were being discovered, a big amount of birds that had teeth and claws began appearing.  This showed that their old reason for the archaeopteryx being a "missing link" is not really proof at all since there were other birds with these same features.

Along with this argument, he talked about similar results occurring with Australopoithecus afarensis (in other words, an Ape).  Macroevolutionists wanted to believe this to be the "missing link" between men and apes, but the fossil indicated that is was purely an ape.

Basically, judging by the outcome of these two discoveries (and many more), if macroevolution really did happen, then the fossil world would be littered with "missing links" which are transitional form fossils.  Macroevolutoinists have little evidence going for their beliefs, and a lot of evidence going against it, and not even their little evidence (such as the archaeopteryx and the 'ape') is fully accurate.  

With all these facts taken into consideration, it just goes to show you how absurd evolution can be, having little in-accurate proof supporting it, and a lot of accurate proof apposing it.  Through these studies, I've concluded how amazing our God is, in that he is able to create such distinct and different species.

   

Source: Dr. Jay L. While from Exploring Creation with Biology 2nd Edition